Spot ETFs take in $134.5M; near-dated puts priced 4.4 vol points over calls
โข Spot ETFs take in $134.5Mโข Near-dated puts priced 4.4 vol points over callsโข BTC steady at $84,107
Chapter 1: Global Macro & Central Bank Liquidity
Start with the discount rate. The US 10-year sits at 5.18%(+2.2bp d/d), the top of its one-year range, 100th percentile, and this is precisely the regime where cash flows furthest out get marked down hardest.
Money, however, moved the other way. US spot bitcoin ETFs took in +$134M on 25 Sep, and +$2.4B over the last 5 sessions (Farside, confirmed a day late). The institutional window did not close while yields rose. Look inside it, though, and the bid is concentrated: IBIT alone took +$97M, 72.1% of the total, with the rest at FBTC +$49M, BITB -$12M.
The resolution sits on the liquidity side. Take the Fed balance sheet at $6.75T, subtract the Treasury General Account at $924.6B and reverse repo at $600M, and $5.82T is what actually circulates (Fed H.4.1, US Treasury, NY Fed). Reverse repo has drained to $600M, which means the cash once parked at the Fed's window is already inside the market. Money is expensive, but it has not been withdrawn.
The dollar points the same way. DXY at 100.97(-0.32% d/d) against a 30-day correlation to bitcoin of -0.42 (1-year -0.18) keeps the structure intact: flows arrive when the dollar gives way. The settlement layer grew with it: USDT $183.9B (+0.32% w/w), USDC $75.4B (+1.29% w/w), and total stablecoin supply is +0.83% on the week (DefiLlama).
๐ก Chief strategist's read: High rates and drained liquidity are two different things. Right now money is expensive but it has not been withdrawn, and that gap is what keeps the downside sticky. So the number to watch is not the level of yields but whether the Treasury balance starts rebuilding while reverse repo is already empty โ from that point on, higher rates really do mean less liquidity.
| Asset | 30 days | 90 days | 1 year | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETH (Ethereum) | +0.87 | +0.89 | +0.92 | Moves closely with BTC |
| Gold (Gold futures) | +0.66 | +0.51 | +0.23 | Moves closely with BTC |
| S&P500 (S&P 500) | +0.45 | +0.38 | +0.47 | Moves loosely with BTC |
| Nasdaq (Nasdaq Composite) | +0.44 | +0.40 | +0.47 | Moves loosely with BTC |
| DXY (US Dollar Index) | -0.42 | -0.39 | -0.18 | Tends to move against BTC |
| US10Y (US 10Y yield) | -0.34 | -0.17 | -0.08 | Tends to move against BTC |
Unlock Chapters 2 & 3 with Pro Pass
Chapter 2: funding, futures basis, option skew and the strikes where open interest is stacked. Chapter 3: AI infrastructure stocks and where both AEGIS models stand today, with their stop and target levels.
Quantitative & Macro Methodology Guides
Bitcoin Derivatives: Analyzing Open Interest Regimes in Coin-Margined vs. Stablecoin-Margined Markets
This guide unpacks the nuances of Bitcoin open interest analysis, differentiating between coin-margined and stablecoin-margined futures and understanding its implications when price trends diverge from OI movements.
Bitcoin Miner Economics After the Halving: Hashrate, Difficulty Adjustments, and Supply Pressure
How network hashrate trends, 14-day difficulty adjustments, and miner reserve outflows help quantify structural supply pressure in the Bitcoin market.
Avoiding Overfitting in Quantitative Crypto Strategies: Walk-Forward Validation and Fee-Adjusted Execution
How quantitative researchers validate systematic trading models using exact bar-by-bar execution engines, realistic exchange fee deductions, and out-of-sample walk-forward testing.